Guardian review of Patrick Leigh Fermor: An Adventure

Perhaps the most remarkable thing about Patrick Leigh Fermor’s legendary life is that it lasted as long as it did. He died in 2011 at the age of 96, having survived enough assaults on his existence to make Rasputin seem like a quitter. He was car-bombed by communists in Greece, knifed in Bulgaria, and pursued by thousands of Wehrmacht troops across Crete after kidnapping the commander of German forces on the island. Malaria, cancer and traffic accidents failed to claim him.

By Robert Macfarlane

The Guardian, Friday 12 October 2012.

He was the target of a long-standing Cretan blood vendetta, which did not deter him from returning to the island, though assassins waited with rifles and binoculars outside the villages he visited. He was beaten into a bloody mess by a gang of pink-coated Irish huntsmen after he asked if they buggered their foxes. He smoked 80 cigarettes a day for 30 years, and often set his bed-clothes ablaze after falling asleep with a lit fag in hand. He drank epically, and would “drown hangovers like kittens” in breakfast pints of beer and vodka. As a young SOE agent in Cairo in 1943, the centrepiece of his Christmas lunch was a turkey stuffed with Benzedrine pills; at the age of 69 he swam the Hellespont – and was nearly swept away by the current.

Yes, Leigh Fermor was an insurer’s nightmare, an actuary’s case-study, and his longevity was preposterous. He might best be imagined as a mixture of Peter Pan, Forrest Gump, James Bond and Thomas Browne. He was elegant as a cat, darkly handsome, unboreable, curious, fearless, fortunate, blessed with a near-eidetic memory, and surely one of the great English prose stylists of his generation.

In 1933, aged 18, he set off to walk from the Hook of Holland to Constantinople, passing through a Europe on the brink of calamity. Decades later, he published two books recounting his wander through that enshadowed land, A Time of Gifts (1977) and Between the Woods and the Water (1985). Both were instant classics, celebrated for their evocation of a since-shattered world, and for the tendrils and curlicues of their language. In between that walk and those books, Paddy (as he was mostly known) was the lover of a Romanian princess, took part in a royalist cavalry charge in Greece, parachuted into occupied Crete to co-ordinate the resistance, spent months in silent retreat in monasteries, became the most famous English Hellenophile since Byron, was played by Dirk Bogarde in a Powell and Pressburger film, and transformed travel writing.

He lived an inspirationally heterodox life that combined adventure and reflection in unique measure. His story has hitherto been known only in parts, and mostly through the refractive prism of his own tellings. At last his biography has been detailed in full, in Artemis Cooper’s tender and excellent book. Reading it is an odd experience: there is the melancholy of having one’s hero humanised, joined with renewed astonishment at the miracle he made of himself.

For a man who would become a legend, things began inauspiciously. Feral and feckless as a child, Leigh Fermor was expelled from school after school. He was briefly happy at an experimental institution where the few timetabled activities included nude eurhythmics and country dancing. But the school was closed and the problems returned. His father, a geologist in the Raj, despaired of his wild son, and – like many despairing fathers of wild sons – signed him up for Sandhurst. Leigh Fermor reacted by moving to London, donning a lightly worn socialism, and partying hard. Indebted and unfocused, by 1933 he was – as he put it – “slowly and enjoyably disintegrating in a miniature Rake’s Progress”.

There the story might have ended. But on a rainy evening of “dead-beat, hungover idleness”, he was seized with the idea of walking across Europe to the gates of Asia. Carousing had been his rejection of conventional education; walking would be his rejection of carousing. He kitted himself out with puttees, riding breeches and a greatcoat, somehow acquired the rucksack that Robert Byron had carried to Mount Athos, bought a walking stick of ashwood, and set off on what has been called “the longest gap year in history”.

Leigh Fermor had from childhood wanted to live “with an intensity that seemed only to exist in books”. This had got him into trouble in England; it was his virtue in Europe. Repeatedly he was welcomed by consuls and by counts – an adolescent super-tramp making a “country-house progress” eastwards. He walked across Bavaria in a “fairy-tale winter” of “thick, silent snow”, reciting reams of poetry in five languages to himself as he went. He met entomologists, polymaths, political scientists, shepherds and aristocrats. He romped in hayricks with milk-maids, and spent a night singing in a sea-cave with fishermen, “like a flickering firelight scene out of Salvator Rosa”. He was given money, transport and hospitality; he gave back charm and ebullience. “What made him so immediately engaging to people,” Cooper observes, “was that he shone with joy … The greatest blessing a guest can bring to his host is the right kind of curiosity, and it bubbled out of Paddy like a natural spring.”

The diary he kept during that journey reads, in the main, like any teenager’s jotting-book: “Bucharest amazing town … Wandered around ages, soaking it in … Lovely town.” What a contrast with the published account, written decades later and told in a fabulously ornate style that bristles with finials and is rich with whorls. Here he is, describing a sunset on the Hungarian plains: “The flatness of the Alföld leaves a stage for cloud-events at sunset that are dangerous to describe: levitated armies in deadlock and riderless squadrons descending in slow-motion to smouldering and sulphurous lagoons where barbicans gradually collapse and fleets of burning triremes turn dark before sinking.”

This dusk is epic, reflexive, a single sentence that burns itself magnificently down in honour of the day’s own inferno. He knows the risks he is taking with his tone (the cloud-events are “dangerous to describe”), but writes with the confidence of a hyperbolist good enough to earn his excess. And how superbly he manages it – the Altdorfer-like invocations of battle, the gradual combustions, the Germanic delay of that last vital verb until, at last, it is reached and the whole slow scene subsides.

Cooper details the evolution of this style: his youthful admiration for Walter Pater and Joris-Karl Huysmans (both lavishly prolix writers, both preoccupied with cultural twilight), his flirtation with high Catholicism and the baroque, and his discovery of the Landsknecht mercenaries of the 16th century, in whose appearance “medieval solidity [was] adorned with a jungle of inorganic Renaissance detail”. “Everything that could fork, ramify, coil, flutter, fold back or thread through itself,” wrote Leigh Fermor of the Landsknechts, “suddenly sprang to action.” Just such a fondness for involution became the hallmark of his own prose. He at last reached Constantinople on New Year’s Eve, 1934. Four more years of scholar-gypsy wandering in Europe followed, until the outbreak of war brought him back to London. He enlisted in the Irish Guards, but was then recruited to the Special Operations Executive. He trained in Palestine at what must have been his ideal school, “where the pupils were taught forgery, gambling, theft and arson”. (“The Molotov cocktail lecture and practical went off successfully,” reads a diary entry from the time.) Then he was landed on Crete, where with the local partisans he carried out the famous “Kreipe Operation” – kidnapping the German general and exfiltrating him to Cairo. Cooper is outstanding on the highs and lows of his war years: his accidental killing of a Cretan friend, Yanni Tsangarakis, the aura of “dangerous glamour” that he acquired, and the sensitive question of the Kreipe coup’s relation to German reprisals.

Cooper also dispenses with several of the many Leigh Fermor myths: he was not, in fact, wealthy; he was “Anglo-Irish” only tenuously; he was subject to “bouts of depression”; and while he could “enchant both men and women”, not everyone liked him. Freya Stark described him as “a Hellenistic lesser sea-god of a rather low period”, Somerset Maugham as “a middle-class gigolo for upper-class women”, and Fermor admitted his own occasional “rhinoceros-hide obtuseness”.

The figure who emerges from this outstanding biography is, though, more glorious for the faint tarnish he acquires in its course. His passion for life emerges as a moral force, invigorating and inspiring those around him. His gifts were profuse, and he gave of them without expectation of recompense. What he discovered was that such benevolence prompts the finest forms of reward: love, friendship and loyalty. Shortly before he died, “at a moment when he felt the end was close”, he scribbled a message in a biography of Proust. “Love to all and kindness to all friends,” it read, “and thank you all for a life of great happiness.”

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Guardian review of Patrick Leigh Fermor: An Adventure

  1. Ray Sadler

    A fair review of an excellent “warts and all” biography of a very complex man – still a hero to me, not for the Kreipe abduction so much as for the exuberant life lived to the full albeit sometimes without much regard for the sensitivities of others. Joan seems a candidate for canonization!

    Reply
  2. Tim

    I was fortunate enough to be invited to lunch with Paddy at Dumbleton a few years back, along with a few acquaintances with whom we had been exploring the route taken by Paddy and others for the Kreipe abduction. I think it was 2005 and therefore some 60 years or so since the tragic death of Yanni Tsangarakis. Artemis was present and taking notes about the answers to the questions we were firing off at Paddy but when I raised this subject Paddy asked her to put her notebook and pen down. As he told the story there was a tear in his eye, to my mind it was remarkable how he was still so affected by the occasion and how he completely accepted that the accident, for that is what it was, was his sole responsibility. He said he offered to resign his position but of course the offer was not accepted.
    If memory serves, later after the war, he was walking with Xan Fielding in Crete when it was pointed out to him that a relative of Tsangarakis was waiting ahead to fulfill a vendetta and kill Paddy. As often is the case, some mischievous person had sought to use the accident/incident to further a political purpose and had suggested that Paddy had deliberately shot Tsangarakis as a deserter. There could be no greater insult to the family, nor an account further from the truth (Paddy had failed to check his rifle after a cadet whop had been training returned it to him and, when cleaning it, had accidentally fired it hitting Tsangarakis in the thigh causing massive blood loss).
    As I recall George Psychoundakis, the Cretan Runner, who eventually came to the rescue and arranged for Paddy and the individual threatening him, to be joint God parents of a child related to Tsangarakis. That relationship held more sway than the vendetta and gave room for the issue to be aired and the true account revealed.
    I had always felt Paddy was a rare man of honour and the hurt that he still felt when telling the story, and his unquestioning acceptance of responsibility, confirmed his honour to my mind. I have met a few who have little time for Paddy and his exploits in Crete, or who have been critical of his relationships with wealthy women but frankly, when it comes to finding people who unquestionably accept responsibility for their actions, I know of none who will come anywhere near Paddy.

    Reply
    1. proverbs6to10 Post author

      A full, and given the lack of any written record, and the mortality of those involved, probaby the final explantion is on the biography Tim. It is pretty much as you say. Paddy did visit and knew that the relative of Tsangarakis was waiting to fulfill the fued and to kill him. I think that he was also with Joan but they walked out of the village keeping their cool, and the rifleman was distracted.

      Reply
  3. Nicolas

    As previous posters have noted, a review that does justice to its subject, and a reviewer with a real understanding of Paddy’s unique personality. My copy of the bio should be in my mailbox in a matter of days now, hopefully!

    Reply
  4. Nikos Galousis

    Car bombed by communists in Greece? Knifed in Bulgaria? A Target of a Cretan blood vendetta? Why don’t we know anything about these incidents? Who’s going to shed some light?

    Reply
  5. Giles Denmark

    That is an enjoyable review. Like many over the many years i have constantly looked for books by Paddy – and felt a little miffed that he didnt complete the final part of that seminal trip to Istanbul – but perhaps he left it unsaid for a purpose. I now will have to go and buy the book ……

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s