Tag Archives: Nicholas Mellor

A Time of Gifts: Forgiveness

Marina Cantacuzino

I hope that you have enjoyed the series by Nicholas Mellor over the last few weeks. To end the series, Nicholas has invited Marina Cantacuzino (daughter of Sherban) to close with what he calls a “final coda to ‘A Time of Gifts”. Nicholas has presented this whole series to friends as  “A Time of Gifts: A Song Cycle in Four Movements”; perhaps you might also see it in that way?

By Marina Cantacuzino

 

‘I never wore the beryl necklace. By the time I was old enough to understand what it represented, my grandmother had already offered it up to fund humanitarian aid for revolutionary Romania. Instead of resting on my shoulders or on my sister Ilinca’s, it had been transformed into medicine and morphine for a Bucharest hospital with empty shelves.

For years, I thought of Monique de la Bruchollerie as simply the courier – the exotic French pianist who carried the necklace from my grandfather to my grandmother, keeping it for eighteen years before it was finally retrieved. That is the story that has already been told in ‘A Time of Gifts: the Pianist’. But that was never the whole story.

When Trauma Crosses Generations

George Matei Cantacuzino Securitatae file

George Matei Cantacuzino Securitatae file

Over time, I’ve come to understand Monique and my recent ancestors as inseparable from my work with The Forgiveness Project, a charity committed to ending cycles of revenge and promoting restorative solutions in the aftermath of trauma. Monique’s trauma remained unresolved. My grandfather, George Matei Cantacuzino, classified by the Communists as a ‘person of unclean origin and refused permission to join his family in England, dealt with his trauma of captivity and separation through writing and painting. He died in 1960 aged 61. My grandmother who came to England with their two young children in 1939 never saw her husband again.

George Matei Cantacuzino in his studio

George Matei Cantacuzino in his studio

She kept his memory alive by telling her seven grandchildren stories about him, nurturing a connection so deep that a few days before he died, she dreamt she was making up a camp bed for her youngest grandchild, only for it to turn into a coffin. In the dream my grandfather then appears before her, calmly saying, ‘That bed is for me.’ As children, her telling of the dream both thrilled and appalled us.  My grandmother’s life gave rise to a quiet stoicism; her sunken blue eyes couldn’t hide her sorrow even though she insisted she was happier as a chicken farmer in Kent than she’d ever been belonging to the aristocratic milieu of Bucharest that had welcomed the young Leigh Fermor into their midst.

For us, the grandfather we never knew became a myth, a legend, a person to be admired and memorialised as an architect, artist and writer. This can happen when trauma goes unresolved: it crosses from one generation to the next. Views become entrenched. Certain perspectives are lost. The virtuoso who helped my family becomes a footnote. Her gift of music and courage, her suffering erased by a government that wanted the story to disappear.

My father grew up in England, eventually becoming an architect and heritage conservationist. After 1989, he devoted himself to Romania – founding Pro Patrimonio, working to preserve the wooden churches and painted monasteries. Later I watched Brexit shatter him. He couldn’t understand how the country that had welcomed him in 1939 could turn its back on Europe. When he died in February 2018, I was convinced he was broken as much by Brexit as by leukaemia.

What did I inherit from all this? Not a necklace. Not property or title. I inherited stories about separation and loss, about how political decisions shatter families, about the weight carried by those who flee. I inherited my father’s conviction that the past shapes who we become.

And I inherited a question: what do we do with suffering?

Forgiveness as Gift

In 2004, I founded The Forgiveness Project. It was a political act – a response to the language of division and reprisal surrounding the invasion of Iraq. But unconsciously, it was also part of my attempt to understand what I had inherited from my Romanian roots: unresolved trauma, and the ways people survive what has been done to them without allowing it to poison everything that follows.

The project collects and shares stories of people who have experienced terrible harm – violence, murder, terrorism, genocide – and found ways to move beyond vengeance.

This isn’t about forgetting or excusing. It’s about what becomes possible when people refuse to let perpetrators define their future, when they choose understanding over bitterness, when they interrupt cycles of retaliation. The Forgiveness Project doesn’t demand that people forgive. Some find it impossible. Others discover it gradually. What the project does is create space for people to explore the possibility, to hear from others who’ve walked that path, to make their own choices about how to carry their pain forward.  Pain I’ve discovered is the greatest motivator to forgive.

I’ve spent twenty years now listening to stories. A mother who lost her son to violence chooses to work with young people at risk. A man wrongly imprisoned for decades refuses to spend his freedom consumed by rage. A survivor of the Rwandan genocide reconciles with her neighbour who participated in the killing. These aren’t abstract achievements. They’re concrete demonstrations that human beings possess a remarkable capacity for transformation.

I won’t claim forgiveness is the ultimate gift – that sounds too grand. But it might be one of the most difficult ones. It requires acknowledging harm without being consumed by it. It means recognising that perpetrators are human without excusing what they did. It demands that we interrupt cycles of vengeance even when those cycles feel justified, even when the authorities who caused harm never admit it, even when – as with Monique – there’s no compensation, no acknowledgement, no justice.

The Thread

Nearly ninety years ago, Patrick Leigh Fermor walked into Romania and was welcomed by my family. They offered hospitality to a penniless wanderer. His writings became a kind of preservation – capturing a vanished world before the wars tore it apart.

1947, my grandfather entrusted jewellery to the French pianist. Monique carried it across borders, performed in Romania despite the risks, paid for her generosity with her career and health. Her trauma remained unresolved, her story buried in official silence.

To make peace with the trauma of the past requires making amends or finding meaning. Each generation has tried to respond to harm in ways that didn’t simply perpetuate it. My grandfather endured prison rather than betray his principles. My grandmother offered up the necklace rather than keep it as a reminder of her lost husband. My father rebuilt Romania’s heritage. My aunt tirelessly translated her father’s writing which had been banned by the Communist government. Monique played three concerts in one day and lost everything. Each tried to respond to harm in ways that didn’t simply perpetuate it.

My sister, Ilinca Cantacuzino, also inherited our father’s conviction that heritage matters. Her artistic journey shares a similar interest to mine in the intergenerational consequences of unresolved trauma. Threading our grandfather’s life into her own, her art has become a form of visual storytelling that shows how destructive legacies can be transformed into something of beauty and meaning.

The Trio by Ilinca Cantacuzino

When Romania joined the EU in 2007, a cultural transformation began with literary and visual creators bringing their skills and knowledge to breathe new life into the country which they or their parents and grandparents had left. Ilinca took advantage of this revival, creating a show in the modernised vaults of Bucharest’s iconic bookstore, Liberia Carturesti. Legături de sânge (“In the Blood”) was an exhibition combining her work with that of our grandfather, drawing on kinship, blood ties and invisible inheritance.

GMC ‘muncitor’ by Ilinca Cantacuzino

In making works which speak to our grandfather’s deep love of his country, her art pays homage both to her personal and national heritage. Her paintings are in dialogue with our grandfather’s oils, watercolours, and architectural drawings. Though Ilinca, like me, never knew our grandfather, the connection between their work is clear – not just in the use of colour, but in the way emotions seem to pass across the generations.

Smoke and burning are recurring symbols of memory, time and destruction. Ghost, a portrait of our grandfather, is a multimedia piece using ink and smoke. Piatra Statica I and Piatra Statica II (Stone Still 1 and II) are drawings on pebbles of our grandfather and grandmother with one pebble originating from a river in Romania and the other from a beach in Kent.  These ‘found objects’ give an iconic sense of place as well as referring to the arbitrary and impermanent nature of lives torn apart.

Piatra Statica I and Piatra Statica II (Stone Still 1 and II) by Ilinca Cantacuzino

Ghost by Ilinca Cantcuzino

One of her works Unfold is an installation, a series of notebooks in which Ilinca kept a visual record of her interior conversations signifying how intergenerational relationships connect threads between past and present. She once said that not knowing our grandfather was the bond, “In a way this enabled him to become my muse. . .  His influence on my spiritual and artistic life has remained undiluted.  I grew up knowing him only through his paintings and my grandmother’s memories.’

In the years to come, Ilinca exhibited more of her work in Romania alongside that of our grandfather, gradually reintroducing a man whose reputation had been deliberately suppressed through censorship. In the post-communist 21st century, a growing appetite was emerging among Romanians to rediscover and engage with their own heritage.

GMC – ‘pictor’ by Ilinca Cantacuzino

Finding Meaning

The essence at the heart of my work could be summed up in the words of the great Russian writer and dissident Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn in The Gulag Archipelago:

If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?

When I came across this passage – a little while after founding The Forgiveness Project – it struck me how perfectly it articulated the ethos of the charity.

At the same time, my aunt was translating her father’s letters, opening up a whole new understanding of his life for us.  In his final years our grandfather had taken refuge in letter-writing – letters contemplating love, nature, memory and the proximity of good and evil. Many of these letters were written to his English friend, Simon Bayer, whom he had met whilst fighting in the First World War.  One letter in particular, written in 1955, caught my attention. In it my grandfather ponders the effect of his five years as a political prisoner, addressing his correspondent’s presumption that his past ordeals must surely mean he is filled with bitterness. He replies: ‘I think of evil as inherent in human nature, as the natural shadow cast by good. I do not have any feelings of resentment. Because I do not stand in judgement on the actions of others, I have nothing to forgive.’

Forgiveness: An Exploration by Marina Cantacuzino

Forgiveness: An Exploration by Marina Cantacuzino

It is a remarkably openhearted statement coming from a man who under the Communist regime was tortured and vilified, and lost almost everything.

The beryl necklace is gone, sold nearly thirty-five years ago. But it represented to me that some things matter more than possession, that generosity can transform objects into meaning, that how we respond to suffering shapes not just ourselves but generations to come.  Not as certainty but as question. Not as answer but as practice. One story at a time, one choice at a time, one moment at a time when someone decides that the harm done to them won’t define what they do next.

I am also reminded of the prescient words of psychoanalyst, Roger Woolger, known best for his ancestor work, who once stated that: ‘It is the responsibility of the living to heal the dead. Otherwise their unfinished business will continue to play out in our fears and phobias.’

Marina Cantacuzino is a writer, campaigner and the founder of The Forgiveness Project

Sources and References

Ilinca’s exhibition: descriptions of the art from this https://londongrip.co.uk/2011/08/art-the-arts-in-romania-by-teresa-howard/

Family History:

  • Cantacuzino family archives and personal correspondence
  • Marina Cantacuzino, ‘My Romanian father was broken as much by Brexit as by leukaemia’, The Independent, 2018
  • Princess Sanda Cantacuzino (1899-1992): refugee to England 1939, lived in Kent
  • George Matei Cantacuzino (1899-1960): architect, essayist, imprisoned 1948-1953 at Aiud Prison Camp
  • Șerban Cantacuzino CBE (1928-2018): architect, heritage conservationist, founded Pro Patrimonio 2000

Monique de la Bruchollerie:

  • See ‘The Pianist and the Necklace’ for detailed references
  • Winner, IV International Chopin Piano Competition, Warsaw, 1937
  • Three concerts, Cluj, 18th December 1966
  • Car accident, 18th December 1966, Carpathian mountains
  • Death: 15th December 1972, Paris, aged fifty-seven

The Forgiveness Project:

  • Founded by Marina Cantacuzino, 2003
  • Charity collecting and sharing stories of forgiveness and reconciliation
  • Works with victims and perpetrators of crime and conflict
  • Website: http://www.theforgivenessproject.com
  • Marina Cantacuzino, The Forgiveness Project: Stories for a Vengeful Age (Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2015)

Brexit and Șerban Cantacuzino:

  • EU Referendum, 23rd June 2016
  • Keith Lowe, Savage Continent: Europe in the Aftermath of World War II (Viking, 2012)
  • Șerban Cantacuzino’s work on European heritage and cross-border cooperation documented in Pro Patrimonio archives

Pro Patrimonio:

  • Founded 2000 by Șerban Cantacuzino as Romania’s National Trust equivalent
  • Works to preserve Romanian architectural heritage, particularly wooden churches and painted monasteries
  • Eight vernacular wooden churches in Maramureș designated UNESCO World Heritage sites (with Sherban as rapporteur general)

Historical Context:

  • Patrick Leigh Fermor, A Time of Gifts (1977) and Between the Woods and the Water (1986)
  • Patrick Leigh Fermor’s relationship with Princess Bălașa Cantacuzino, 1934-1939
  • The beryl necklace: given to Monique de la Bruchollerie 1947, recovered 1964, sold 1989
  • Romanian Revolution, December 1989: execution of Nicolae and Elena Ceaușescu, 25th December 1989
  • Humanitarian mission to Bucharest, December 1989-January 1990 (funded by sale of beryl necklace)

The Securitate:

  • Romanian secret police, 1948-1989
  • Estimated one informer for every forty-three Romanians by 1980s
  • Files on approximately 700,000 Romanian citizens
  • Post-1989: files opened to those who were surveilled; many chose not to know who informed on them

Themes and Influences:

  • Intergenerational trauma and its transmission
  • Unresolved trauma and institutional denial
  • Forgiveness as interruption of cycles of vengeance
  • The role of diaspora communities in post-conflict reconstruction
  • Heritage preservation as peace-building

Note: This essay draws on family archives, personal experience, and the documented history of the Cantacuzino family’s experience of exile, imprisonment, and post-communist reconstruction. The Forgiveness Project’s work is documented through published stories and research available at www.theforgivenessproject.com.

 

A Time of Gifts: The Refugee

Serban Cantacuzino

Serban Cantacuzino

This essay, the third in a marvellously well researched series by Nicholas Mellor, serves as a coda to his first post ‘A Time of Gifts: the Beryl Necklace and the Watermelon’, and looks beyond the immediate experience of revolution to examine how diaspora communities contribute to post-conflict peacebuilding; a subject that has real currency at the moment. It draws on Marina Cantacuzino’s account of her father (all being distant cousins of Balasha and Pomme) and obituaries by Dan Teodorovici and the Royal Institute of British Architects.

 

 

 

By Nicholas Mellor

The fall of Ceaușescu on Christmas Day 1989 did not simply end a dictatorship—it broke down a dam. In the months and years that followed, something remarkable began to happen: those who had fled decades earlier started returning, not as tourists nostalgically revisiting childhood haunts, but as builders bringing back what they had learned in exile. The revolution created space for a particular kind of peacebuilding, one that would rely on the gifts of the diaspora to help Romania reconnect with its interrupted past and build a richer and more resilient future.

The Boy Who Left, The Architect Who Returned

Sherban Cantacuzino was eleven years old when his mother took him from Romania to England in 1939. It was meant to be temporary—a brief sojourn until the political storms passed. His father, George Matei Cantacuzino, a renowned architect and polymath whom Marina describes as the ‘Ruskin of Romania’, stayed behind. The family would be reunited, they believed, once the madness ended.

But history had other plans. First came the war, then the Iron Curtain. George Matei Cantacuzino was imprisoned by the communists from 1948 to 1953, deemed a ‘person of unclean origin’. He was forbidden to leave Romania, forbidden to see his wife and children again. For thirty-two years, father and son lived parallel lives—both architects, both scholars, both guardians of culture—separated by ideology and barbed wire. During this time George Matei  wrote 63 letters that reached his refugee family, and these provided the roots for a film made about his life. : ‘Letters from George’. The film provides a glimpse of the Romania that Patrick Leigh Fermor would have known. NB: ‘Letters from George’ is directed by Sofia Peters. Producers: Anita Nitulescu, Milo Sumner and George Rowell.

George Matei Cantacuzino possibly in 1930s Bucharest

George Matei Cantacuzino possibly in 1930s Bucharest

When George Matei died in 1960, Sherban was still in London, still waiting. It is said that absence makes the heart grow fonder, but for the Romanian diaspora, it did something more profound: it transformed nostalgia into mission. Sherban Cantacuzino built a distinguished career in Britain—Fellow of the Royal Institute of British Architects, editor of the Architectural Review, secretary of the Royal Fine Arts Commission. He wrote seminal books on heritage conservation: Saving Old Buildings, New Uses for Old Buildings, Architecture in Continuity. His influential work What Makes a Good Building helped establish design quality guidance in the UK planning system. He was awarded a CBE in 1988.

Yet through it all, Romania remained. Not just as memory, but as calling.

When the Fountain Began to Flow Again

On Christmas Day 1989, when Nicolae and Elena Ceaușescu were executed, Sherban’s mother—the Princess, as she was known in her Kentish village—lit a candle in her window and prayed for her country’s deliverance. Marina writes that her grandmother would never have cheered such an execution, but there was no question that the dictator whose brutal rule had condemned millions deserved his fate. The prayers were not just for an ending, but for a beginning.

Sherban Cantacuzino had briefly returned to Romania in 1971, navigating the grey world of Ceaușescu’s surveillance state. But after 1989, everything changed. The Iron Curtain had fallen. The fountain was flowing again. And like myself toasting Romania’s uncertain rebirth with watermelon and țuică, Sherban could return not as a visitor under suspicion, but as a bearer of gifts of heritage stewardship.

He devoted the remainder of his life to Romania’s cultural restoration. He led private tours for family and friends, sharing the painted monasteries of Moldavia, the wooden churches of Maramureș, the Saxon villages of Transylvania—the same treasures he had shown Marina and her sister Ilinca in 1976. But now he could do more than show. He could help preserve.

Building Romania’s National Trust

In 2000, Sherban Cantacuzino founded Pro Patrimonio, effectively creating Romania’s National Trust. It was an extraordinary act of cultural repatriation—not of objects, but of expertise, passion, and institutional knowledge. Everything he had learned during decades in Britain about heritage conservation, about engaging the public, about making the case for preservation, he now channelled into his homeland.

The work was vital. Communist rule had been devastating not just economically but culturally. Historic buildings had been demolished or left to decay. The systematic campaign to erase Romania’s architectural heritage—most notoriously Ceaușescu’s destruction of Bucharest’s historic centre to build the monstrous Palace of the Parliament—had left deep scars. Pro Patrimonio became a voice for continuity, for the idea that Romania’s future depended on honouring its past.

Sherban’s influence extended far beyond one organisation. He served as rapporteur general for UNESCO, helping to secure World Heritage status for eight vernacular wooden churches in Maramureș and for Auguste Perret’s reconstruction of Le Havre. He worked tirelessly—and courageously—to prevent the destruction of Roșia Montană Mountain by gold mining operations. He became trustee of the International Trust for Croatian Monuments. He was elected Honorary Member of the Union of Romanian Architects and Honorary Professor at the Ion Mincu University.

Whenever he visited Romania in the post-communist era, he was revered—treated like a prince because he was indeed a prince, descended from the great Cantacuzino and Bibescu families. But the reverence was not just for lineage. It was for his dedication. Dan Teodorovici, who wrote his doctoral thesis on Sherban’s father, describes him as ‘one of the finest, uncontested and most influential unofficial cultural ambassadors of Romanian culture during the last three decades’. Based in London, Sherban became a bridge between two worlds, a living link between Romania’s interrupted past and its emerging future.

Refugees as Peace-Builders

What Sherban Cantacuzino understood—what many returning refugees and exiles came to understand—was that post-revolutionary Romania needed more than economic restructuring. The country required reconnection to what had been systematically suppressed: cultural memory, architectural heritage, institutional knowledge about how civil society functions. The diaspora possessed exactly these things, preserved through decades of exile like seeds waiting for the right conditions to germinate.

This kind of peace-building is less dramatic than the revolution itself, but perhaps more essential. Pro Patrimonio didn’t just save buildings; it helped restore a sense of continuity and dignity. By arguing that Romania’s wooden churches and historic towns mattered, Sherban was making a deeper argument: that Romania’s identity wasn’t erased by decades of dictatorship, that the thread connecting past to future hadn’t been entirely severed.

The personal became political in a painful way. Marina writes that her father was ‘broken as much by Brexit as by leukaemia’—not simply because Britain was his adopted home, but because he had devoted his life to building bridges across Europe. He had lived through the aftermath of the Second World War’s vengeance, when the continent tore itself apart. He believed passionately that the European project, for all its flaws, was fundamentally about preventing such horrors from recurring.

Patrick Leigh Fermor’s own story began with a walk across Europe in the 1930s—a journey chronicled in A Time of Gifts, Between the Woods and the Water, and The Broken Road. Patrick Leigh Fermor walked from the Hook of Holland to Constantinople, discovering a Europe still intact before the wars would tear it apart. His writings became, in their own way, a form of heritage preservation—capturing a vanished world of Central European culture, aristocratic hospitality, and the intricate connections between peoples that nationalism and totalitarianism would nearly destroy. We can see echoes of that world in the film ‘Letters from George’. Brexit felt, to someone like Sherban who had dedicated his life to cultural bridge-building, like a rejection of everything that both he and Fermor had worked to preserve and celebrate: a connected Europe where heritage, ideas, and people could flow freely across borders.

Lessons for Post-Conflict Reconstruction

When Sherban Cantacuzino died in London in February 2018, he left behind not just two daughters and five grandchildren, but a blueprint for how diaspora communities can contribute to post-conflict reconstruction. Pro Patrimonio continues its work. The wooden churches of Maramureș stand protected. A generation of Romanian architects and conservationists has been trained in heritage preservation. The consciousness he helped cultivate has taken root.

The trajectory of his life offers lessons that extend far beyond Romania. In the aftermath of political upheaval, countries face a choice: they can treat their diaspora as abandoned expatriates, or they can recognise them as repositories of expertise and institutional memory. Sherban’s story demonstrates what becomes possible when exiles are welcomed back not just sentimentally but practically—when their knowledge is channelled into rebuilding institutions, when their international connections are leveraged for the country’s benefit.

This is particularly crucial in the first years after revolution or conflict, when countries are most vulnerable to repeating past mistakes or lurching into new forms of authoritarianism. The diaspora brings perspective—they have seen how other societies function, how civil society organisations operate, how heritage and culture can be protected whilst allowing for development. They can be, if properly engaged, a stabilising force during turbulent transitions.

But there’s a temporal urgency to this engagement. Sherban was in his early sixties when the Berlin Wall fell—old enough to have deep expertise, young enough to dedicate himself to Romania’s future for two more decades. The returning diaspora of 1990s Romania were the children who had left in the 1930s and 1940s. Had Romania’s transition been delayed another generation, this particular form of knowledge transfer would have been impossible. Those who remembered pre-communist Romania, who could serve as living links to an interrupted past, would have been gone.

The revolution created space for refugees to return and share their gifts, but what made that return transformative was the receptivity of post-revolutionary Romania to what they brought. Sherban wasn’t returning to a country that wanted to erase its past and start afresh—he was returning to a society hungry for reconnection, eager to reclaim what had been suppressed. That receptivity matters as much as the gifts themselves.

In the end, building peace after dictatorship requires more than political and economic reform. It requires cultural restoration, the rebuilding of institutions that give life meaning beyond mere survival. Heritage, memory, beauty, continuity—these are not luxuries but foundations. The diaspora who return bearing such gifts are not nostalgic sentimentalists but essential participants in post-conflict reconstruction.

Patrick Leigh Fermor walked across Europe in the 1930s with little more than curiosity and a gift for friendship, yet his journey became a testament to the power of cultural connection. His writings inspired generations to see Europe not as a collection of nation-states but as an interwoven tapestry of shared heritage, where a Horatian ode could unite captor and captive on a Cretan mountainside, where hospitality transcended borders, where history lived in landscapes and buildings and the memories of those who inhabited them. Sherban Cantacuzino, in his own way, embodied what Patrick Leigh Fermor celebrated: the conviction that heritage and culture are the sinews that bind societies together, that the exile who never forgets can become the bridge-builder who helps a nation remember—and in remembering, discover the continuity necessary not just to survive, but to flourish.